mechanical shuttle versus hydraulic shuttle -
Thread Details Posted by Duke, this thread has received 5 replies and been viewed 3680 times.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old 08-26-2007, 01:28 PM Thread Starter
'Ol Builder guy
Duke's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,051
Points: 71,785
Thanks: 340
Thanked 99 Times in 73 Posts
mechanical shuttle versus hydraulic shuttle

Anyone own a mechanical shuttle tractor?

I know a hydraulic shuttle is nicer to drive and requires no clutch, but can any advantage be said about a mechanical shuttle other than a lower purchase price on the tractor?

I would think it's cheaper to fix, more reliable and less complex?

Trying to think of any advantages they might have over their more expensive hydraulic counterparts.
Duke is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old 08-26-2007, 02:50 PM
86 1 tonhauler's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,585
Points: 21,166
Thanks: 10
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to 86 1 tonhauler
manual shuttle is better , simple , less parts and u know it in gear , hyd shuttle more parts the lever goes bad , relays start to go bad and a few other parts, i used to run a ford 3930 with manual shuttle never had problems with it , new a guy with a hyd shuttle and if gave him chit

1986 f-350 6.9 dually str8 piped ,maxed out injection pump ,bucket seats, diamond plate flat bed,propane injection, on board aircompressor, train horns,goose neck plate, future mod , custom built turbo kit with intercooler and dual 4" miter cut stacks TDG DUALLY CLUB #5
01 chevy 2500 HD 4x4 duramax

anybody got any used 4" miter cut stack laying around? pm me if ya do

quote: BARRY1ME: BTW I love your sig about engineers....but it should be changed to, if the engineers believe it isnt broke it doesnt have enough content removed from it. And thats the truth! (FYI I am engineer and work for Ford lol) At Ford the goal is to make the part barely good enough to passing DV (developmental validation) testing....If it passes way beyond the test then the part was overengineered, and content needs to be removed to reduce cost.

86 1 tonhauler is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old 08-26-2007, 03:24 PM
Senior Member
bmoeller's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NW IL
Posts: 4,817
Points: 57,853
Thanks: 157
Thanked 387 Times in 329 Posts
Do you mean a powershift transmission or a reverser? None of the older ones had electronics, and were still very reliable, as long as they have clean oil and good hyd pressure. They can still take a LOT of abuse.

Even the newer electronically controlled transmissions are pretty reliable. Most of our big tractors have powershift trannys, and have little to no trouble with them at all.

"Some people are educated beyond their intelligence."

'93 W350 CC, LE, 5spd, HTT modded H1C, 4" DE

Sold- '99 3500 Q/C, SO CTD, 4x4, 5spd.

Traded off- '97 3500 C/C, 4x4, CTD

'92 W250, LE, CC, CTD w/ tweaked pump (SOLD)

"Obama = Hoax and Chains"

If Obama is the answer, it must have been a stupid question.
bmoeller is offline  
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old 08-26-2007, 03:53 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 342
Points: 4,941
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
My kubota has a mechanical shuttle. It works just fine for me. Sure, a hydraulic shuttle is nicer to run, but the mechanical works just fine and is simpler
sbrem is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old 08-26-2007, 06:47 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 155
Points: 685
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The only 2 pluses on a mechanical shuttle shift is:
a: lower cost
b: doesn't breake down (no solinoids going bad and being stuck in either forward other reverse).

I'd rather have a power shuttle than a mechanical one. Just makes a lot of working with the tractor so much better.

07 Chevrolet Classic 2500HD, LBZ 6.6L Duramax Diesel, 4" Magnaflow duals and Superchips.
05 Passat TDI, 2.0L pumpe duse diesel, stock.
DieselMonk is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old 08-29-2007, 01:01 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,754
Points: 19,385
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Im on the other end of the spectrum, hydraulic is usually much better. Most people w/a mechanical shuttle get in a hrry and grind and jam them pretty ahrd, even the average homeowner grinds it a bit, hydraulics take the "company man" abuse much better. YOu can go full spedd forward to reverse w/o letting off the throttle many times a day w/a hdraulic and not hav ea problem. New hydraulic shuttle shifts are reliable, youll get more productivity out of a hydraulic too if your using it for business.

1996 Gmc k2500 4x4 6.5 turbo diesel, with mods Blew the head gasket, put all new heads, valves, injecotrs gaskets etc on the truck only to get it together and find out it had no oil pressure, and sounded horrible (pry a spun bearing). SOLD
2007 chevrolet 2500hd Duramax loaded. GM LEMON BUYBACK
2007 Chevrolet LBZ 1 ton crew cab 8ft box
on star, xm, tow mirrors, 145 amp alt,
#23 Singles Club
thejdman04 is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome