Chevy 6.2 and 6.5. Why no love? - Diesel Truck Forum - TheDieselGarage.com
Thread Details Posted by Anitshine, this thread has received 30 replies and been viewed 6742 times.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 31 (permalink) Old 01-30-2009, 10:36 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2
Points: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Chevy 6.2 and 6.5. Why no love?

So i am relatively new to diesel. I've been playing with mud trucks for years and decided to start pullin. I hear the good and bad things about all the cummin's and powerstrokes. Yet when it comes to chevy diesel, i can't find anyone to say a good word about them all that way until duramax. So i ask, why no love for the 6.2 an 6.5? If anyone can help me out with why they are "junk" that would be awesome.
Anitshine is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 31 (permalink) Old 01-30-2009, 11:23 PM
Super Moderator
 
John_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 4,247
Points: 74,614
Thanks: 101
Thanked 407 Times in 347 Posts
They are the lightest duty diesels offered in a pickup.

Neither is abuse tolerant, this means that virtually ANY abuse from skipping an oil change to mile overheating will shorten their life.

They are essentially the same engine with different displacements, that's an over simplification, but reasonabally accurate. They are light and return good mileage when spec'd correctly, but underpowered and short-lived if spec'd wrong or over worked. Not what you expect from a diesel, sorta reminds me of the Olds 350D

'93 F-250 HD, 7.3L IDI, 5spd - FARM TRUCK
I Support: Trailer brakes an every axle over the towing vehicle's GVW; CDLs for RVers; Safety inspections for ALL vehicles and 6 axle trucks (97K GVW proposal).

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote - Benjamin Franklin

I vote for LIBERTY!
John_G is offline  
post #3 of 31 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 12:41 AM
Super Moderator
 
nevrenufhp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,188
Points: 106,430
Thanks: 259
Thanked 236 Times in 181 Posts
They are mostly popular for folks with a full size rig that are looking for better mpg than a V8 gasser. Think of it as a "Basic Transportation" engine.

Dale

my daily driver:67 F100, 300 4V, cammed, 4 spd.
or, 08 Subaloser Forester, 2" lift.
work rigs: 94 IH 4900, DT466(originally 230hp), #0 fuel plate, tighter gov springs, 22* timing
or, 06 IH 7400, DT466E, 300hp


My Low Buck fuel rate site:
www.freewebs.com/nevrenufhp
nevrenufhp is offline  
post #4 of 31 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 01:59 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 125
Points: 10,672
Thanks: 11
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
they are just cheaply made. poor casting on blocks and heads, the harmonic balancers fail causing them to break cracks. I personally wouldnt take one out my drive way. (there not that bad but you get the point)

2005 3.9 Cummins 4BTAA 94 dodge 1500 2wd A518 trans 27 mpg around town
http://www.cumminsforum.com/forum/cu...ics-truck.html
Friends 95 dodge 2500 #6 fuel plate and 35lbs of boost.

Last edited by JakeDiesel; 02-01-2009 at 04:29 AM.
JakeDiesel is offline  
post #5 of 31 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 03:39 AM
Tav
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Back home in Iowa!
Posts: 85
Points: 18,930
Thanks: 17
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
Garage
The later 6.5's aren't that bad...afterall they were used in the military HMMWV's. A little under powered (of course I was driving a 10k pound armored truck through the mountains). It's not a racing motor by anymeans.
Tav is offline  
post #6 of 31 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 04:07 AM Thread Starter
Threadstarter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2
Points: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well then, looks like i won't be buying me a chevy diesel anytime soon. Thanks for all the info. If anyone has any nifty tech stuff that would prove helpful to my new diesel tinkering self. Let me know, it will be much appreciated!!
Anitshine is offline  
post #7 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-03-2009, 01:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: e.texas
Posts: 590
Points: 42,619
Thanks: 8
Thanked 63 Times in 52 Posts
well if tinkering is what you want to do, the 6.2 or 6.5 is a great choice. they are cheap and very simple to work on. early 6.2 engines [82'/83'] had some head gasket issues. get the uprgade headbolt, problem solved. harmonic balancers with lot of age or miles can as mentioned lead to stress cracks, or more likely a broke crank shaft. this applies to both the 6.2 and 6.5 engines. 6.2 engines will pull any load a 350 will pull, add a turbo and it will run with a stock 454, [pre vortec]. i have/had both, as well as hauled alongside others. the 6.5 is a decent puller also, stick with the mechanical engines for reliability, computerized one's had some issues. wether 6.2 or 6.5, something to keep in mind, if it has a turbo, keep a close eye on egt's. 6.5 engines have a lillte think crowned piston, but both are subject to cracking from excess egt's, too often. rings get brittle also. as for maintnance, both will hold up better then any powerstroke when it comes to poor maintance. my oldest 6.2 had nearly 400k on it before breaking a crank [ see balancer advise] , and it had seen several 12/15k mile oil changes. after nearly a million miles of seat time behind trucks powered with these engines, not a single one left me stranded. i have used them exclusively in my farming and construction buisness, hauling anything from 1500lb hayrakes to 15000lb backhoes , frequently. while i would rather use one of my fords or dodges to do the serious towing these days, i still remember the time when a turboed 6.2 had to do all the pulling, and i still use it on ocassion.
navistar45 is offline  
post #8 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-03-2009, 03:09 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 13
Points: 1,696
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My only expierience was with a friend's truck the block was cracked around the main bearing cap bolts all of them, the rebuilder said this was common, with high mileage, hope this info helps, besides its a bow tie.............I would rather own the blue oval, what ever you do have fun with it, even if you need it for work!!!!!!!!

03 F250 CC FX4 5.4 Now a Cummins 5.9 CR
1937 Ford 2dr sedan slantback 5.0 HO
375.0ford is offline  
post #9 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-03-2009, 03:58 PM
Junior Member
 
richarr9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 51
Points: 23,360
Thanks: 7
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
6.2/6.5s are not nessesarily bad motors they are just in a different catagory as the PSD, Cummins, and D max. They are more of a lighter duty engine, they have decent power, but will never compare to the heavier duty engines. And can not survive when put under the stess that the other motors are built for.

96 Chevy K3500 6.5 diesel with 230k miles
4" lift 4" exhaust and PMD heatsink

And a DT466 going into a 2.5 ton 6x6 army truck

Quote:
put it in 3rd. gear & nailed it & it took off like a missile for about 50 ft. & then the turbo exploded kinda like a missile!!!
richarr9 is offline  
post #10 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-03-2009, 05:15 PM
stock is boring
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Franklin co.,PA
Posts: 214
Points: 17,925
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tav View Post
The later 6.5's aren't that bad...afterall they were used in the military HMMWV's. A little under powered (of course I was driving a 10k pound armored truck through the mountains). It's not a racing motor by anymeans.
The military 6.5l engine is no longer produced by GM it is produced by AM GENERAL and is a similar but different motor than what GM produced. Check out these links.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...65/ai_55993969
http://www.thedieselpage.com/features/AMGsnew65.htm

'04 LB7 4DR LONG BED 4x4
'02 LB7 REG CAB Utility body 2wd
dragnsled is offline  
Reply

Tags
help the noob!

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Diesel Truck Forum - TheDieselGarage.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LOVE IT/LOVE IT/LOVE IT f-250 6.4 long bed 2wd imported_QUICK83 2008-2010 6.4L Power Stroke 5 12-26-2007 02:31 AM
Love it envirocad Introductions 6 05-11-2007 02:51 PM
I love these CumminsPower General Dodge Discussion 2 01-15-2007 06:03 AM
I love the NFL! Super Limo The Parking Lot 28 09-09-2006 12:43 AM
I think I'm in love! SuperSonic Duramax 2006-2007(LBZ & LLY) 23 12-18-2005 03:49 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome