The Diesel Garage banner

About the Cat 1676

8736 Views 6 Replies 5 Participants Last post by  Tutu'z Garage
Hi,

For all those of you who remember the 8-cylinder derivative of the 4.5" bore Cat 1673 diesel, the 1676, what did you think of it at the time?

Specifications:
Bore: 4.5 in. (114 mm)
Stroke: 5.5 in. (140 mm)
Displacement: 700 cu. in. (11.5 liters)

It was an OHC design, and was supplanted by the 1693 (later 3406) six-cylinder diesel around 1967. However, the 1676 was also the basis for Cat's other Class 8 V-8 diesel engine, the 18-liter 3408, which has the same 5.4" bore as the 3406, but a slightly shorter 6" stroke as opposed to the 3406's 6.5" piston stroke (this results in the 3408 having the same bore/stroke ratio of 0.9:1, like the mid-range 1160/3208 with its 4.5" bore and 5" stroke).

~Ben
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
1676 Cat's other Class 8 V-8...

I've always liked the 3408 I know they have what it takes to get a big load down the road quick. Their wide RPM range is what impressed me...plus their potential for more added horsepower is insane.
The engine little talked about is the 1676...I now know it boasted 700 cu. in.
@ 11 liters whereas the 3408 comes in @ 18 liters...if anyone knows the horsepower rating of the 1676 please let me know...there's 1 in the UK if it's
worth the effort...
Hi,

For all those of you who remember the 8-cylinder derivative of the 4.5" bore Cat 1673 diesel, the 1676, what did you think of it at the time?

Specifications:
Bore: 4.5 in. (114 mm)
Stroke: 5.5 in. (140 mm)
Displacement: 700 cu. in. (11.5 liters)

It was an OHC design, and was supplanted by the 1693 (later 3406) six-cylinder diesel around 1967. However, the 1676 was also the basis for Cat's other Class 8 V-8 diesel engine, the 18-liter 3408, which has the same 5.4" bore as the 3406, but a slightly shorter 6" stroke as opposed to the 3406's 6.5" piston stroke (this results in the 3408 having the same bore/stroke ratio of 0.9:1, like the mid-range 1160/3208 with its 4.5" bore and 5" stroke).

~Ben
A nitemare to work on. That's all I really remember for hands on. Lifter clickers, quill drives, yada yada... :damnit

I've always liked the 3408 I know they have what it takes to get a big load down the road quick. Their wide RPM range is what impressed me...plus their potential for more added horsepower is insane.
The engine little talked about is the 1676...I now know it boasted 700 cu. in.
@ 11 liters whereas the 3408 comes in @ 18 liters...if anyone knows the horsepower rating of the 1676 please let me know...there's 1 in the UK if it's
worth the effort...
165/ 185/ 220 for the big one. That's just top o' my head... K. Spray away Long!!! ;)
  • Like
Reactions: 1
:sprayw
:happymugs
I've always liked the 3408 I know they have what it takes to get a big load down the road quick. Their wide RPM range is what impressed me...plus their potential for more added horsepower is insane.
The engine little talked about is the 1676...I now know it boasted 700 cu. in.
@ 11 liters whereas the 3408 comes in @ 18 liters...if anyone knows the horsepower rating of the 1676 please let me know...there's 1 in the UK if it's
worth the effort...
i believe the 1676 was a 320 horse motor , the 1673 was 270ish i think
i believe the 1676 was a 320 horse motor , the 1673 was 270ish i think
That's alot of power for almost the same cubes and motor as a 3208 but in Pre-Cup 40 years ago and 8MM plungers. I could be wrong tho. That's microfich stuff I don't have access to. :happymugs
It's good to know...I was thinking about grabbing 1 that's in the UK...325hp was what
that later model 8V-71's could put out...that gives me an idea where I can go with the 1676. I hear they were in the early model 621 scrapers which tells me they can haul a
decent load. I didn't want to grab 1 & find out later I'm stuck with a "Mud Duck..."
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top